Victory in Mauritius: Abortion Decriminalised
Victories, even partial, are rare in these times. The Mauritian political party LALIT would like to share an important new development in the class struggle and struggle for women’s emancipation in Mauritius.
LALIT is the only political party that, over the decades, has campaigned for abortion decriminalisation. Finally last month parliament passed a new abortion law to replace the 1838 total ban. Everyone in the country knows that this is a LALIT struggle, as our stand on abortion decriminalisation had often been used “against” us. So it is like getting accumulated “support”.
This victory comes less than a year after another victory credited to LALIT: the introduction into schools of the mother tongues Kreol and Bhojpuri for the very first time.
The new abortion law decriminalises abortion in the circumstances of serious ill health of the woman or malformation of the foetus, rape, incest or statutory rape. It means that all women can now speak openly about abortion, and can, when ill after a complication resulting from a future illegal abortion, go to hospitals for treatment with more freedom. And the struggle continues.
The law came into the National Assembly only two months after the women’s organisation Muvman Liberasyon Fam (MLF) had held ceremonies in two cemeteries with the families of women who had died as a direct result of abortion still being illegal.
Over the past three years the MLF had stepped up its campaign for abortion decriminalisation and had put into question the very wording of the archaic law, which referred to a woman being “quick with child”. A woman had been charged in 2009 with illegal abortion, and the director of public prosecutions had finally dropped charges after women mobilised against the law as “not clear”. In 2011 he admitted in public that the wording was not clear enough for him to arrest and charge women once the expression “quick with child” was exposed to scrutiny. Jurisprudence showed that the phrase usually meant around the 20th week of pregnancy, but the DPP’s office had for 174 years assumed it meant simply “pregnant”, because the French version of the law used the word “enceinte”.
The MLF called for a Common Front on Abortion, which became very strong. The death of a woman photo journalist following an illegal abortion changed the balance of forces enormously, as all the reporters and other employees of the press groups could no longer toe the line of the main companies that run the press, which are historically close to the Catholic Church.
Thanks to the mobilisation of women behind the bill, even if only for partial legalisation — a mobilisation organised mainly by LALIT women in the leadership of the MLF — the law was passed with only 20% of MPs voting against. This massive support in parliament was despite a campaign that would make you think “everyone” is against, or, if not, then too weak to stand up to the religious lobbies opposing abortion.
Every time parliament met, there were dozens of women in the galleries, holding press conferences before or after, and even staying until after midnight. There was a candlelight ceremony in memory of women who had died from illegal abortions.
The mobilisation was given strong vocal support by the Nursing Association, the biggest union in the health sector. The leadership, including Ashok Callooa and Ram Nawzadick, and the women’s wing representatives, all spoke out in favour of the bill and attended mobilising events. The union called for complete decriminalisation and for women to feel free to come to hospital. “We are here to look after the sick, not to judge you”, Ashok Callooa announced. He also said that nurses are the ones who see the suffering that results from back-street abortions, and he, like almost everyone else in the debate, put emphasis on the class issue. Poor women suffered disproportionately from the repressive law.
Other unions also gave strong support, including the Government Teachers’ Union and the Federation of Para-Statal Bodies as well as the big Confederation of Private Sector Workers. This added to the growing support from human rights groups and the family planning organisation.
A surprisingly large number of MPs spoke in favour of nearly total decriminalisation, showing their reliance on the argumentation developed over decades of struggle, especially by LALIT and the MLF. Another surprise was the strong secular approach among MPs of almost all parties. They put emphasis on the health issues, human rights and the need for a secular state.
The only parties against were three that have only one MP each, the FSM (a fundamentalist party), the MMSD (run by a maverick capitalist) and the OPR (run by a former Catholic priest). Two parties were 100% in favour, despite giving a “free vote”: Labour, and the bigger of the two Rodrigues parties, the Mouvement Rodrigues, whose two MPs spoke eloquently from the point of view of working class women. The Labour Party’s coalition partner, the PMSD, was three out of four in favour, as was the Opposition MSM.
The opposition MMM was split down the middle, and thus came out worst, with its anti-abortion MPs making fools of themselves in speeches so outrageous that the press denounced them unanimously. This long-ago left party is now a bastion of reaction. One of the MMM’s MPs, Jean-Claude Barbier, actually told parliament that God had personally spoken to him about what to say in “the august Assembly”.
While some MPs spoke of “murderers”, one MMM deputy, Lysie Ribot, said that women who had abortions were also more likely to have road accidents and get cancer of the cervix. Grotesquely, she said that women who were raped were unlikely to fall pregnant because their ovulation was “blocked”. Adil Meea, another MMM MP, said religion was one of the last defences against degeneracy and depravity. Soon, he said, we will hear talk of same-sex marriages.
These reactionaries were marginalised completely by the massive support for the law, not only in parliament, but also outside. A survey of women’s opinions in the country carried out by a big commercial opinion poll company found that more than two-thirds of women were in favour of decriminalisation and only 20% against, thus reflecting the vote in parliament.
Direct Action — July 19, 2012